Dos soles – Planeta X – Mencionado desde hace varias décadas
Artículos publicados hace varios años sobre el descubrimiento de un misterioso gran cuerpo celeste.
A continuación presentaré los siguientes artículos y publicaciones sobre el descubrimiento de un cuerpo celeste no identificado que se ha llamado el planeta X.
Los artículos son los siguientes:
Del Washington Post – Diciembre 1983 – Misterioso cuerpo celeste descubierto, los detalles y texto completo están más adelante.
Del New York Times – Enero 1983 – Las pistas se calientan en la búsqueda del Planeta X.
Estudio del Dr. Robert Harrington sobre la ubicación del planeta X – 1988.
New York Times Julio 1987 Buscando el Planeta X – Viejas Pistas Nueva Teoría.
Junio 1988 Buscando el Planeta X – Viejas Pistas Nueva Teoría.
Anomalías en el sistema solar exterior continúan a fechas recientes.
Antes de mostrar los detalles de los artículos de hace varias décadas, para su investigación, y para aquéllos que están interesados en una investigación más profunda y diligente, les diré que las anomalías (que podrían estar siendo provocadas por un objeto muy grande) en planetas más lejanos de nuestro sistema continúan.
Por ejemplo las misteriosas mega tormentas que han roto record en 2014 en Urano.
De la revista New Scientist – Mystery storms rage across face of Uranus
- 21 January 2015
- Magazine issue 3005.
STORMS have clouded Uranus’s normally placid face. In the past year, the gas planet has played host to huge cloud systems so bright that even amateur astronomers can see them from Earth – and their cause is a mystery.
“We have no idea. It’s very unexpected,” says Imke de Pater at the University of California, Berkeley.
De Pater observed Uranus on 5 and 6 August, 2014, and was surprised to spot unusually bright features, the hallmark of clouds condensing in the planet’s upper atmosphere. “It was brighter than anything we had ever seen in Uranus’s atmosphere before,” she says. The planet’s weather generally picks up at its spring and autumn equinoxes every 42 years, when the sun shines on the equator. But the last equinox was 7 years ago, so the recent spike in activity is difficult to explain.
Enlace a reporte de astrónomos de Universidad de Cornell
Aqui Enlace a otro artículo de Enero 2015, en el que científicos dicen que las anomalías en el comportamiento de cuerpos exteriores del sistema solar puede estar siendo ocasionado por super planetas aún no descubiertos.
Aqui Enlace a reporte de Space.com del 16 de enero 2015 sobre la posibilidad de dos planetas más grandes que la tierra pueden estar orbitando más allá de Plutón
Washington Post – Diciembre 1983 – Misterioso cuerpo celeste descubierto,
En el periódico The Washington Post se publicó en Diciembre de 1983, varios artículos sobre el descubrimiento de un misterioso cuerpo celeste.
Abajo presento las imágenes de los artículos y el texto original completo en inglés, sólo presento la traducción de un par de los primeros párrafos.
“Posiblemente tan grande como Júpiter
Misterioso cuerpo celeste descubierto”
Por Thomas O´Toole – Washington Post
Un cuerpo celeste posiblemente tan grande como el planeta gigante Júpiter y posiblemente tan cercano a la tierra que sería parte del sistema solar, ha sido encontrado en dirección de la constelación Orión por un telescopio orbital a bordo del satélite astronómico infrarojo de los Estados Unidos.
Todo lo que te puedo decir es que no sabemos qué es, dijo en entrevista, el Dr. Gerry Neugebauer, jefe científico IRAS para el California Jet Propulsion Laboratory y director del observatorio Palomar para el Instituto de Tecnología de California.
Possibly as Large as Jupiter;
Mystery Heavenly Body Discovered
By Thomas O’Toole, Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, December 30, 1983 ; Page A1
A heavenly body possibly as large as the giant planet Jupiter and possibly so close to Earth
that it would be part of this solar system has been found in the direction of the constellation
Orion by an orbiting telescope aboard the U.S. infrared astronomical satellite.
So mysterious is the object that astronomers do not know if it is a planet, a giant comet, a
nearby “protostar” that never got hot enough to become a star, a distant galaxy so young that
it is still in the process of forming its first stars or a galaxy so shrouded in dust that none of the
light cast by its stars ever gets through.
“All I can tell you is that we don’t know what it is,” Dr. Gerry Neugebauer, IRAS chief
scientist for California’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory and director of the Palomar Observatory
for the California Institute of Technology, said in an interview.
The most fascinating explanation of this mystery body, which is so cold it casts no light and
has never been seen by optical telescopes on Earth or in space, is that it is a giant gaseous
planet as large as Jupiter and as close to Earth as 50 trillion miles. While that may seem like a
great distance in earthbound terms, it is a stone’s throw in cosmological terms, so close in fact
that it would be the nearest heavenly body to Earth beyond the outermost planet Pluto.
“If it is really that close, it would be a part of our solar system,” said Dr. James Houck of
Cornell University’s Center for Radio Physics and Space Research and a member of the
IRAS science team. “If it is that close, I don’t know how the world’s planetary scientists
would even begin to classify it.”
The mystery body was seen twice by the infrared satellite as it scanned the northern sky from
last January to November, when the satellite ran out of the supercold helium that allowed its
telescope to see the coldest bodies in the heavens. The second observation took place six
months after the first and suggested the mystery body had not moved from its spot in the sky
near the western edge of the constellation Orion in that time.
“This suggests it’s not a comet because a comet would not be as large as the one we’ve
observed and a comet would probably have moved,” Houck said. “A planet may have moved
if it were as close as 50 trillion miles but it could still be a more distant planet and not have
moved in six months time.”
Whatever it is, Houck said, the mystery body is so cold its temperature is no more than 40
degrees above “absolute” zero, which is 456 degrees Fahrenheit below zero. The telescope
aboard IRAS is cooled so low and is so sensitive it can “see” objects in the heavens that are
only 20 degrees above absolute zero.
When IRAS scientists first saw the mystery body and calculated that it could be as close as
50 trillion miles, there was some speculation that it might be moving toward Earth.
“It’s not incoming mail,” Cal Tech’s Neugebauer said. “I want to douse that idea with as much
cold water as I can.”
Then, what is it? What if it is as large as Jupiter and so close to the sun it would be part of the
solar system? Conceivably, it could be the 10th planet astronomers have searched for in vain.
It also might be a Jupiter-like star that started out to become a star eons ago but never got hot
enough like the sun to become a star.
While they cannot disprove that notion, Neugebauer and Houck are so bedeviled by it that
they do not want to accept it. Neugebauer and Houck “hope” the mystery body is a distant
galaxy either so young that its stars have not begun to shine or so surrounded by dust that its
starlight cannot penetrate the shroud.
“I believe it’s one of these dark, young galaxies that we have never been able to observe
before,” Neugebauer said.
“If it is, then it is a major step forward in our understanding of the size of the universe, how the
universe formed and how it continues to form as time goes on.”
The next step in pinpointing what the mystery body is, Neuegebauer said, is to search for it
with the world’s largest optical telescopes. Already, the 100-inch diameter telescope at Cerro
del Tololo in Chile has begun its search and the 200-inch telescope at Palomar Mountain in
California has earmarked several nights next year to look for it. If the body is close enough
and emits even a hint of light, the Palomar telescope should find it since the infrared satellite
has pinpointed its position.
(ITEM 123)December 31, 1983, Saturday, Final Edition
(ITEM 127)The distance from earth of a mysterious object in space was reported incorrectly
in some editions yesterday. The correct figure is 50 billion miles.
Articles appear as they were originally printed in The Washington Post and may not
include subsequent corrections.
Artículo del New York Times – Enero 1983
En este artículo el Dr. John Anderson del Jet Propulsion Laboratory de Pasadena California dice que los extraños comportamientos de los planetas exteriores de nuestro sistema solar pueden ser ocasionados por una estrella enana café.
IDEAS AND TRENDS; CLUES GET WARM IN THE SEARCH FOR PLANET X
By JOHN NOBLE WILFORD
Published: January 30, 1983
SOMETHING out there beyond the farthest reaches of the known solar system seems to be tugging at Uranus and Neptune. Some gravitational force keeps perturbing the two giant planets, causing irregularities in their orbits. The force suggests a presence far away and unseen, a large object that may be the long-sought Planet X.
Evidence assembled in recent years has led several groups of astronomers to renew the search for the 10th planet. They are devoting more time to visual observations with the 200-inch telescope at Mount Palomar in California. They are tracking two Pioneer spacecraft, now approaching the orbit of distant Pluto, to see if variations in their trajectories provide clues to the source of the mysterious force. And they are hoping that a satellite-borne telescope launched last week will detect heat ”signatures” from the planet, or whatever it is out there.
The Infrared Astronomical Satellite was boosted into a 560-milehigh polar orbit Tuesday night from Vandenberg Air Force Base, Calif. It represents an $80-million venture by the United States, Britain and the Netherlands. In the next six or seven months, the telescope is expected to conduct a wide-ranging survey of nearly all the sky, detecting sources not of ordinary light but of infrared radiation, which is invisible to the human eye and largely absorbed by the atmosphere. Scientists thus hope that the new telescope will chart thousands of infrared-emitting objects that have gone undetected – stars, interstellar clouds, asteroids and, with any luck, the object that pulls at Uranus and Neptune.
The last time a serious search of the skies was made it led to the discovery in 1930 of Pluto, the ninth planet. But the story begins more than a century before that, after the discovery of Uranus in 1781 by the English astronomer and musician William Herschel. Until then, the planetary system seemed to end with Saturn.
As astronomers observed Uranus, noting irregularities in its orbital path, many speculated that they were witnessing the gravitational pull of an unknown planet. So began the first planetary search based on astronomers’ predictions, which ended in the 1840’s with the discovery of Neptune almost simultaneously by English, French and German astronomers.
But Neptune was not massive enough to account entirely for the orbital behavior of Uranus. Indeed, Neptune itself seemed to be affected by a still more remote planet. In the late 19th century, two American astronomers, William H. Pickering and Percival Lowell, predicted the size and approximate location of the trans-Neptunian body, which Lowell called Planet X.
Years later, Pluto was detected by Clyde W. Tombaugh working at Lowell Observatory in Arizona. Several astronomers, however, suspected it might not be the Planet X of prediction. Subsequent observations proved them right. Pluto was too small to change the orbits of Uranus and Neptune; the combined mass of Pluto and its recently discovered satellite, Charon, is only one-fifth that of Earth’s moon.
Recent calculations by the United States Naval Observatory have confirmed the orbital perturbation exhibited by Uranus and Neptune, which Dr. Thomas C. Van Flandern, an astronomer at the observatory, says could be explained by ”a single undiscovered planet.” He and a colleague, Dr. Robert Harrington, calculate that the 10th planet should be two to five times more massive than Earth and have a highly elliptical orbit that takes it some 5 billion miles beyond that of Pluto – hardly next-door but still within the gravitational influence of the Sun.
Some astronomers have reacted cautiously to 10th-planet predictions. They remember the long, futile quest for the planet Vulcan inside the orbit of Mercury; Vulcan, it turned out, did not exist. They wonder why such a large object as a 10th planet escaped the exhaustive survey by Mr. Tombaugh, who is sure it is not in the two-thirds of the sky he examined. But according to Dr. Ray T. Reynolds of the Ames Research Center in Mountain View, Calif., other astronomers ”are so sure of the 10th planet, they think there’s nothing left but to name it.”
At a scientific meeting last summer, 10th-planet partisans tended to prevail. Alternative explanations for the outer-planet perturbations were offered. The something out there, some scientists said, might be an unseen black hole or neutron star passing through the Sun’s vicinity. Defenders of the 10th planet parried the suggestions. Material falling into the gravitational field of a black hole, the remains of a very massive star after its complete gravitational collapse, should give off detectable X-rays, they noted; no X-rays have been detected. A neutron star, a less massive star that has collapsed to a highly dense state, should affect the courses of comets, they said; yet no such changes have been observed.
More credence was given to the hypothesis that a ”brown dwarf” star accounts for the mysterious force. This is the informal name astronomers give to celestial bodies that were not massive enough for their thermonuclear furnaces to ignite; perhaps like the huge planet Jupiter, they just missed being self-illuminating stars.
Most stars are paired, so it is not unreasonable to suggest that the Sun has a dim companion. Moreover, a brown dwarf in the neighborhood might not reflect enough light to be seen far away, said Dr. John Anderson of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif. Its gravitational forces, however, should produce energy detectable by the Infrared Astronomical Satellite.
Whatever the mysterious force, be it a brown dwarf or a large planet, Dr. Anderson said he was ”quite optimistic” that the infrared telescope might find it and that the Pioneer spacecraft could supply an estimate of the object’s mass. Of course, no one can be sure that even this discovery would define the outermost boundary of the solar system
Dr. Robert Harrington – La ubicación del Planeta X.
El Dr. Robert Harrignton era jefe de astronomía en el Observatorio de la Marina de los Estados Unidos, en 1988 publicó un estudio sobre la localización del Planeta X. Enlace aqui
En 1991 se dirigió a Nueva Zelanda para tomar fotos del objeto, las fotos no se hicieron públicas y el Dr. Harrington murió muy poco tiempo después.
Buscando el Planeta X – Viejas Pistas Nueva Teoría.
Artículo del New York Times – 1 de julio de 1987
El Pioneer 10 continúa buscando el misterioso planeta X.
En un artículo publicado por el Victoria Advocate del 14 de junio 1988, el mismo Dr. John D Anderson del JPL referido anteriormente en artículos previos, dice en entrevista que “Tenemos un 90 a 99 por ciento de seguridad que están siendo afectados y un candidato para eso es el planeta X”.